> Hi gilpel; > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 02:04 +0500, gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 09:36 +0500, gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > Again, any messages in dmesg or /var/log/messages >> > or /var/log/Xorg.0.log? >> >> Yes this one, in dmesg: >> >> NVRM: API mismatch: the client has version 185.18.31 but this kernel >> module has version 185.18.14 >> >> If I boot with kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 and I >> uninstall/install >> kmod-nvidia, I still get version 185.18.14. >> > and for > kernel.x86_64 2.6.29.6-217.2.7.fc11 s > kernel.x86_64 2.6.29.6-217.2.8.fc11 > > kmod-nvidia version 185.18.14 is what you are supposed to get. Then, why do I have: locate "185.18.31" /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGLcore.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libcuda.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-cfg.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-tls.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libvdpau.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libvdpau_nvidia.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/libvdpau_trace.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/nvidia/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.185.18.31 /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so.185.18.31 I never enabled rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing , but somebody suggested that I install kernel-headers and *kernel-devel* for akmod. Is this possibly the reason? >> If I boot with kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.9.fc11.x86_64 and I >> uninstall/install >> kmod-nvidia, will I get version 185.18.31 ? > > Where did you get kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.9.fc11.x86_64? Nowhere, it's a typo. I did a uname -r and replaced the 3 by a 9 instead of an 8. > Why not stick with kernel-2.6.29.6-217.2.8.fc11 ? It certainly is my intention. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
