>>sam.sharpe wrote: >> >>> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working >>> module >> >>I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you >>say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making >>sure everything just works. And they do it in a very timely matter. > > I agree with you 110%, after all, they also provide akmod-nvidia so > they are always the winners in my book. I've had one single issue of the > akmod not building a valid module, but I think I was using > updates-testing at the time so I wouldn't complain! > > Go rpmfusion! I wouldn't be using Linux everywhere without you guys! If you've been following discussions on this group recently, you must have noticed that, whenever I don't like something about the way things work in the open-source world, I say it openly. But rpmfusion... rpmfusion... What could one find to say against the way rpmfusion works? So far, all the packages they've provided work and, as far as I know, only on their site will you find complete instructions on installing the NVIDIA drivers. (Lots of disinformation on the net, but nobody seems to give a damn about all the would-be Linux adopters lost this way.) Yeah... what's wrong about rpmfusion? Ah, I got it: they provide a package for mplayer so we don't have to pay Microsoft twice by paying for Fluendo. Ah, they're really bad! That's why I like them I suppose :) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
