Note to Patrick O'Callaghan and all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It seems I can't receive mail for now, will probably be back tomorrow.

To Patrick O'Callaghan:

Maybe this will make more sense if I add a little word I forgot:

> Why is it impossible to **not** include the "ugly" equivalent for MPlayer?
> This, and only this, is what I don't understand.

In other words, if the win32 codecs are not in "essentials" and kept
separated, wouldn't it be OK?

Real player codecs also seem to be kept separated, e.g.:

rp9codecs-20050115.tar.bz2

OTOH... Marco seems right about FFMPEG:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ffmpeg#Legal_status_of_codecs

It just seems surprising to me that mplayer can't play anything that is
non-proprietary while Totem can.

Now, I'm really going to bed :)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux