On 07/29/2009 12:24 AM, Joe Smith wrote:
I can't see that it's your fault, or Fedora's. It seems like a bad
design to me, to use stock resources in a way that's almost guaranteed
to break, but here's the official response:
Yes, "this is a feature and no bug."
I'd say it's worth asking them to take another look, since a routine
upgrade will break documents that are otherwise untouched, but in the
end it's all rather academic.
Thanks for the bug. Yes, it seems rather odd to even have their numbered
directory for their stock items. Do they really plan on letting people
have OO.org 2.0 and OO.org 3.0 installed at the same time? What would
that gain anyone?
I'll mull it over and create more havoc when I think I'm ready.
fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list