Re: Status of a 2.6.30 kernel ? Other sources for a 2.6.30 kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 13:25:35 -0400,
  Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The claim is that the test is optimized away, and that would seem to be  
> a separate issue from using the value of tun before testing.

But that is valid because if you had deferenced a null pointer previously
you are now in an undefined state and you can do anything. So it is valid
to optimize the test away because it always fails if the pointer is not
null and if it is null you are in a state where you are allowed to do
anything.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux