Arthur Pemberton wrote: > However, this seems to place Fedora in a weird position -- between > what most now consider to be the bleeding edge distro, Arch,. and > what many consider to be the stable distro, Ubuntu. What niche does > fedora intend to fullfill? I don't know how relevant any of the data on oswatershed even is, but I believe the Fedora and Red Hat continues to drive a lot of upstream development. That is much more important than who chucks the latest build over the wall to users. When the folks at Archlinux update to the latest release of some project the day it comes out, they can often thank some Fedora contributors for making the upstream release possible. :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Succumb to natural tendencies. Be hateful and boring.
Attachment:
pgpkG3Fxnt1SY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
