stan wrote: > Yeah, they have a binary version available for linux or the mercury > repository version, but no tar ball yet. The vulnerability you > mentioned is not mentioned there that I could see. it may be that it is too new. > So upgrading doesn't seem to be taking that great a risk from the > existing. :-) have you considered dropping back to 3.0.11? 3.0.12 is do very soon and may be better than going with 3.5 series. mozilla 3.5 is starting to look a little like kde 4. :) -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
