Re: Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
From: "G.Wolfe Woodbury" <ggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:38:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <4A5B4575.3050704@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A5B3161.9050409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A5B4575.3050704@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2

On 07/13/2009 10:32 AM, Dunc wrote:

G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:

Thanks for listening.

G.Wolfe Woodbury

I sure pretty much anyone who uses clamav uses the one from RPMforge.

Its a lot tidier and actually works out the box, and has a service set
up for clamd

The fedora one is well known for its awfulness

Dunc


Thank You for the hint!

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

References:
- Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
  - From: G.Wolfe Woodbury
- Re: Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
  - From: Dunc

Prev by Date: Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
Next by Date: Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
Previous by thread: Re: Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
Next by thread: F10, AthlonXP 2500+, recently updated...System freeze?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]