On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:02:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> I have other Fedora things needing doing, so I am not going to spend my >> limited time championing changes in raid 10 configruation restrictions >> when I don't use it and don't know much about its details. >> >> > You have missed what I said twice, so let it go . I said you might ask > to use existing arrays, period. Not raid-10, not degraded raid-1, not > with extra space. I did that too. > I also suggested it be done as a clearly labeled RFE, because people who > look at the existing entry think it's a bug report for something which > is working properly. Going through all the right motions makes it easier > to get others to agree. I had other conversations with the people involved. It has been RFE'd and turned down. > I made a suggestion which might solve your problem, and you reject it > because it might also solve mine. The raid 10 issue may be different. Jeremy thinks that the risk of people getting confused with one element raid 1 arrays outweighs the benefit to a few people wanting to use them. He may not feel so strongly against loosening restrictions on raid 10 arrays. However, I don't care about raid 10 enough to spend time agreeing to test whatever changes might be made, nor do I know enough about raid 10 to make technical arguments about what the limits should be. So I am not going to do it. If you want to, you can discuss it with Jeremy. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
