Re: Firefox 3.5 final?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/6/2009 4:51 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:41 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>>> 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 02:44 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>> [...]>> Any chances F9 and F10 to get this firefox. they're stuck with 3.0.11?
>>>> I would think there's no chance of F9, as it's about to lose support.
>>>> Don't know about F10.
>>>>
>>>> poc
>> [...]
>>
>>> I know, but the versions for f11/f12 were compiled on June, 30. there
>>> is time and I don't want to recompile it by myself, because the
>>> package isn't that small. I hope this can be reconsidered.
>> Have you tried simply running the binary from the Mozilla site? I've
>> often done this. Not ideal because it isn't within the Fedora package
>> system, but certainly doable.
>>
>> poc
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>>
>  I tried it but there are some plugins that have dep-problems (libgpod
> especially)


libgpod is available for Fedora 9 & 10, as well as Fedora 11. In both
x86 and x86_64 archs.



-- 


  David

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux