--- On Fri, 7/3/09, Mail Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mail Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: kernel 2.6.30.1
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 7:47 AM
>
> 2.6.30.1 is the recommended stable kernel by
> upstream - are there
> plans to make this available for f10 and f11 ?? Both f10
> and f11 are
> more lagging than the past it seems - probably with the
> release of f11.
>
> I didnt find much in koji ...
>
> As per linux-kernel mailing list:
>
> 1) 2.6.29.6
> ****NOTE****
> This is the last release of the 2.6.29 kernel series.
> All users are
> strongly suggested to move to the 2.6.30 release series at
> this time.
> ************
>
>
> 2) announcing the release of the 2.6.30.1 kernel.
> All users of the
> 2.6.30 kernel series are very strongly encouraged to
> upgrade.
>
>
> --
I hear you and I am applying the patch from 2.6.30 to 2.6.30.1 as of now. I know your frustrations, but Fedora is staying a bit behind as of now because apparently many things were changed from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30? I don't know the exact reasons, but I understand where you are coming from and I agree with you. Is Fedora countering the saying "Latest and Greatest"? I know that on rawhide a 2.6.31.rcX kernel is being run, that is where the latest and greatest always is, but Fedora Stable should not be so far behind? Should it?
Regards,
Antonio
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
