> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 00:46 +0200, gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Then, all kind of directories were created for gpg. It's as though gpg >> had never been used. That's why I say I have a hard time understanding >> how Fedora plays with GPG. >> >> Of course, not wanting to install confusion between GPG and Fedora, I >> stopped my trials on GPG right at this step. > > When you use GPG for yourself (such as encrypting or signing email or > files), keys are stored within your homespace (~/.gnupg/), and you work > with your personal set of keys. > > When one of the package installing/removing programs deal with GPG for > working with signed packages, those keys are managed in system spaces, > such as /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ and /var/cache/yum/*/gpgdir/, separately from > your own keys. That's definitely a nicer, simple yet more learned way of saying things than "package management hs a seperate database". Thanks to you all, I certainly have a better understanding of HowFedoraWorks now than just a few days ago, security-wise, at least. Things are moving more swiftly than I thought. Of course, I'm eager to know if any of you managed to read wmv at Radio-Canada. There's even a link on the homepage: http://www.radio-canada.ca/ for RDI en Direct, which is also wmv. Soon as MediaPlayerConnectivity plug-in comes out for Firefox 3.5, I should be able to manage by myself, I suppose, but my efforts always lead me to a "manage" solution until now. Maybe there are better solutions. Of course, the problems encountered there have nothing to do with Fedora, but with the Radio-Canada/Microsoft consortium. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
