On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 13:08:08 -0700, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200905@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As for the man-in-the-middle attack, I'd imagine the biggest usage case > is an eavesdropped-in-the-middle and not someone that was able to break > the data stream and insert themselves. Having an encrypted channel with > a slightly nebulous endpoint is still better than having an unencrypted > channel. For average Joes, the most common problem is going to be that their machine is compromized. Extra security of https over http for them is barely a blip. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
