On Saturday 30 May 2009 01:15:37 Robert McBroom (TNWestTex) wrote: > > Anne Wilson wrote: > > I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install > > dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. > > Are the downloaded updates still on your system? > > /var/cache/yum/updates/packages > > Sometimes it helps to use yumex or kyum to do the upgrades in smaller > blocks than everything. It was a long hard slog, but yumex managed to get most of the packages installed. The few that were left failed because I couldn't get the key for rpmfusion non-free updates. I even tried running the installer, but it told me that it had failed to install the key. In the end I installed the packages with --nogpgcheck - obviously not a good solution. > Another variation on updates repo. [updates] > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates failovermethod=priority > mirrorlist=http://presto-mirrors.anmar.eu.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-relea >sed-f$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora > I've managed to pull updates from the direct address of one of the mirrors, so this isn't urgent. What's worse is that I still can't get to the normal fedora repo. Can you give me an equivalent version for that? If I'm right, though, and it's $releasever that isn't being passed, it will still fail. There must be some way to test what it believes $releasever to be? How do you print the contents of a variable like that? Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
