On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 22:11 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: > Is there a movement to get rid of xinetd? It's just that I remember > that the trend used to be to move more server processes to be added to > the inetd config. As I recall, the trend was to move away from it, with individual scripts per service rather than an all encompassing inetd. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
