On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
charles zeitler
> <mailto:shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> --- On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:15 AM, charles zeitler
> <cfzeitler@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:cfzeitler@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:http://lse.sourceforge.net/numa/faq/index.html#numa_v_smp
> | does anybody have any links?
> |
> | especially interested in:
> |
> | how does it work?
> | and linux 2.6 support of SMP
> | with XEON and AMD server motherboards.
> \--
>
> Linux and symmetric multiprocessing:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-linux-smp/
>
> SK
>
> --
> Shakthi Kannan
> http://www.shakthimaan.com
>
>
> thanks, Shakti. it seems that smp is likely not a good fit for the
> multi-socket
> opteron boards. time to google for info on numa..
>
> charles zeitler
As long as you have fewer than a dozen sockets, you'll do fine with an
SMP kernel :)
uh huh. will the smp kernel see non-local memory as part of its shared memory?
charles zeitler
--
Do What Thou Wilt
Shall Be
The Whole of
The Law
-Aleister Crowley
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
