On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 11:24 +0930, Tim wrote: > Tim: > >> There's one thing worse than vi, and that's emacs. ;-) > > Craig White: > > of course the opinion expressed above is from a GNOME user... ;-) > > That just sounds dirty... ;-) > > Actually, my first foray into trying out emacs was on the Amiga, and a > nasty piece of work it was. These days, I tend to use gvim, as it gives > me a menu for all those commands I can't remember, and decent scrolling. ---- probably just me but I'm not crazy about any of the GUI text editors and often just invoke emacs with -nw (no x) and stay in konsole. vi deals with extremely large files much better than emacs. vi is probably cool but I have never taken the time to learn more than the very basic commands. kwrite is ok, I like kate better and if I am going to do any amount of text editing in GUI, it's likely to be kate (and I write this with 2 kwrite windows open on my desktop). commitment phobia Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
