On Wednesday 01 April 2009 14:18:11 David wrote: > On 4/1/2009 8:56 AM, Tim wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:42 +0200, "Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote: > >> Sure, you might not be sure how honest a particular person > >> is, or how accurate she is when it comes to key signing. But it > >> *might* be helpful to know that a key of someone else that you haven't > >> met in person has been signed by, say, 10 different people that you > >> did meet before > > > > You need to know them more than just having met them before, you need to > > know what their attitude is to signing keys. Will they only sign keys > > with users that have credible ID? And could they spot fake ID? > > I use a state issued picture driver license, a birth certificate, and a US > Passport. > It is generally accepted that meeing someone, alone, is not sufficient identification. Before you sign anyone's key, or let them sign yours, you should always see this kind of official documentation. Anyone considering getting keys signed should read http://cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/keysigning_party/en/keysigning_party.html Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines