On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 22:04 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: > 2009/3/16 Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>: > > 2009/3/16 Joonas Sarajärvi <muepsj@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> 2009/3/16 Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>: > >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Marc Wilson <msw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Is there any reason TO do this? Other than that you don't like GDM? > >>> > >>> It's ugly. > >> > >> I think it's functional and beautiful, even though some other login > >> managers have some options which GDM doesn't. > >> > >> I wouldn't want to use KDM if I happened to use Gnome. It would look > >> out of place and add tons of completely unnecessary dependencies. > > > > > > Seems like that rationale only holds water against non Gnome things. > > I'd guess there aren't currently KDE alternatives to most of the > system-config-* tools, which are based on GTK+. KDE software is used > where possible in the KDE spins. Most of these seem to be written in Python as far as I can see, i.e. any dependancy on GTK is indirect. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines