Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:34:32 -0700
Suvayu Ali wrote:

> Not many have multiple cards, but most do have these multi-stream 
> capable audio hardware. They come in pretty handy if you actually use 
> your desktop as your primary home multimedia device.

Yep. The main reason I always remove pulseaudio is the apparent total
inability to send already encoded sound (like a DVD soundtrack) to the
SP/DIF optical output on my motherboard's sound interface. I spent
weeks decrypting the ALSA gibberish required to get this working,
then pulseaudio wiped out all the work. If it can do it, then it
needs a better mixer interface to show how to do it, if it can't do
it, it needs to be able to before it can replace ALSA for me.

In fact, I suspect what linux needs far more than pulseaudio is a layer
on top of ALSA that sorts all the hardware specific gibberish ALSA
names like "IEC958 Playback AC97-SPSA" into something more meaningful
and provides some explanation for why I have 27 "simple" ALSA sound controls
when my motherboard has only 7 sound related connectors :-).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux