Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:18:42 +0100
• References: <49B10997.9030202@xxxxxxxxxx> <49B1A10E.1080008@xxxxxxxxx> <200903072131.23941.cave.dnb2m97pp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Nigel Henry wrote:
> Alsa had worked ok before pulseaudio entered the equation.

That doesn't mean it's not buggy, the bugs just weren't noticed because
nothing used the APIs PulseAudio uses.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
    • From: suvayu ali

• References:
  • pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
    • From: Neil Bird
  • Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
    • From: Raymond C. Rodgers
  • Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
    • From: Nigel Henry

• Prev by Date: Re: rythmbox not seeing cdrom
• Next by Date: Re: Can jackd and pulseaudio coexist?
• Previous by thread: Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
• Next by thread: Re: pulseaudio deeply unreliable (Fedora 10)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread