Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> This is very strange, I have no idea why SELinux update would do this,
> and suspect that something else might have gone wrong. Were there other
> packages in the update?
>
> I will update my F10 and see what is going on.
>
> Could be someone is doing a chcon -t usr_t in a post install script?
>
> selinux-policy should only be doing the equivalent of a restorecon -vR
> in its post install. Actually executes fixfiles
> "fixfiles -C ${FILE_CONTEXT}.pre restore"
>
> Which figures out what was different between the old file context and
> the new and runs restorecon on them.
>
>
Dan, I had a problem this morning on another machine where there is a bind
mounted /var/spool/mail directory (restorecon -vR /var/spool/mail seems to
have fixed it). In all the cases where the user contexts had a problem were
machines with bind mounted /home areas. I wonder if this could be the
common factor?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/selinux-policy-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch---slight-hiccup%21-tp22296524p22305496.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
