Re: Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
• From: Bill Crawford <billcrawford1970@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:10:01 +0000
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <60fdb1ad0902152313q19ecc523s30dcb2cb72e8bf2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: None
• References: <60fdb1ad0902151205v6ef67c07v128f0c88f5895240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234751556.17849.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <60fdb1ad0902152313q19ecc523s30dcb2cb72e8bf2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.9.10

On Monday 16 February 2009 07:13:23 Vijay Gill wrote:
...
> In my case I have provided 1M which is far much less than 512M which
> XFS is pre-allocating. This is what caught my eye.

That might be 1M * 512 byte traditional disk sector size?

> Cheers
> Vijay


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• References:
  • Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
    • From: Vijay Gill
  • Re: Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
    • From: Patrick O'Callaghan
  • Re: Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
    • From: Vijay Gill

• Prev by Date: Re: .ICEauthority ?
• Next by Date: Re: preupgrade to go from F9 i386 -> F10 x86_64 ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
• Next by thread: Re:Can somebody explain this? du & ls showing different sizes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread