On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Serguei Miridonov <mirsev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 09 February 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Mike Chalmers > <mikechalmers70@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Nothing else makes as much sense to me in the open source world >> >> that isn't a 'paid' or 'enterprise' edition. >> > >> > Mark we are definitely on the same page. Open source works >> > together, so it is very understandable why a rolling release is >> > good, imo. >> >> I hope you at least understand why a rolling release is >> technically difficult, especially in a distro like Fedora where >> things can change radically from one release to another. > > Probably majority of users would not complain about radical changes in > these frequent upgrades IF new releases don't break something that > people use and rely on every day. With Fedora it happens every > release. A symptom of radical change with limited testing (there only so many testers) -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
