Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 01/31/2009 08:03 AM, g wrote: >> Ambrogio wrote: >> >>> There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable >>> by umans, but more readable by computer? >> consider wider viewing window? > > He said it was a script. this is true. he did not say where he is running script. virtual vs xterm. > The viewing window should be irrelevant. depends on where script is run. > However it looks like yum is formatting its output to the width of the > tty even when stdout is not a terminal. formatting to width of tty? really. i would say it is terminal end of line wrap. > That would be a bug. not a bug. op is at wrong screen size for output length. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
