Re: anyone knowing procmail very good?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 27 January 2009 18:53:59 Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following in .procmailrc:
> (on a pretty bad administrated solaris box running procmail v3.22
> 2001/09/10)
>
> #fedora-devel
>
> :0
>
> * ^Sender:.*fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> * ^TO_fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> fedora-devel
>
>
> This works well in nearly all cases except for some announcements (e.g.
> the "The fonts SIG irregular status report" mail from today)
>
Not knowing the details of those posts, I don't know the reason, but I *think* 
your recipe demands that both conditions are met.  Are they?

> Somehow those messages (although they contain Sender:
> fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx) slip through that rule.
>
Try re-writing that as

> #fedora-devel
> :0
> * (^Sender|To|List-ID): .*fedora-devel-list
> fedora-devel

It should pick up both sets, as it asks that any one of those three fields 
contain 'fedora-devel-list'

Anne

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux