Re: Software RAID 5 or something else?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello all,

I had a drive failure a few months back so I decided it was time to rework
my home server's storage.

Now I have 5 750GB SATA dives and now I need some advice on how to set
things up.

My original idea was to put them in a RAID 5 configuration.  This sounded
good until I started researching RAID controller cards.  It looks like it
will cost me $520 to get a good PCI-E card (3Ware 8 port).  I don't think
I want to spend that much if I don't have to.

My goals are two fold.

1) I want to get some redundancy in case of a drive failure.

2) I want to increase my performance.  I have benchmarked my read and
write performance to and from this server.  Using Samba, I seem to be able
to get about 50Mb/sec reads and 40Mb/sec writes.  I am on a gig network
and would like to be able to max out the cards (90Mb/sec is what I get at
work).

So, the question is, what should I do?

1)  Bite the bullet and get the hardware RAID controller.  Will this give
me the performance I want?

2)  Go with a software RAID 5.  Will I lose performance with this
configuration?  If I use this but only get modest performance gains, that
would be acceptable.

3)  Go with some other software RAID level.

Any help would be appreciated.

---
Will Y.



Will,

I can't help with the software side, but I have a 3ware 8 port myself and here are the stats I am getting from my RAID 5:

(output of tw_cli)
Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Stripe Size(GB) Cache AVrfy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
u0    RAID-5    OK             -       -       64K     3259.56   OFF    ON

Port   Status           Unit   Size        Blocks        Serial
---------------------------------------------------------------
p0     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WMASYXXXXX
p1     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WMASYXXXXX
p2     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WMASYXXXXX
p3     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WMASYXXXXX
p4     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WCAS8XXXXX
p5     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WCAS8XXXXX
p6     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WCAS8XXXXX
p7     OK               u0     465.76 GB   976773168     WD-WCAS8XXXXX

Name  OnlineState  BBUReady  Status    Volt     Temp     Hours  LastCapTest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbu   On           No        Testing   OK       OK       0      24-Nov-2008





Timing Statistics:

/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads:   11640 MB in  2.00 seconds = 5830.68 MB/sec

/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  152 MB in  3.00 seconds =  50.64 MB/sec




my biggest bottle neck right now is the write-cache is off due to a battery test that is being done. Total cost for the card (and battery backup) was about 575.00. The card, from new egg is http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816116054


Another note, 3ware has good support in Linux, and is very nice and easy to manage if you do go that route. I will leave it to the DMraid/software RAID guys to answer for that though


~Seann

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux