Re: VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10
From: Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:06:14 -0600
In-reply-to: <1230566988.4045.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1230566988.4045.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10
From: Christopher A. Williams <chriswfedora@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: 12/29/2008 10:09 AM


Yes.

I can confirm your results. I've had SELinux disabled for a few yearsand just turned it on. Same results with the login page. VMWare Server 2was working fine with SELinux set to Disabled. 32-bit machine. non-PAEkernel.

Note: I've dumped VMWare for VirtualBox now that 2.1.0 has networkbridging alleviated.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

References:
- VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10
  - From: Christopher A. Williams

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora on Asus M3N78-EM, anyone?
Next by Date: Re: Wolfenstein on x86_64
Previous by thread: Re: VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10
Next by thread: Re: VMware Server 2.0, selinux, and F10
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux