On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't know if i'm gonna put that effort in it. I don't like > packagekit that much if people don't make the effort, then it won't be changed. You made the effort to write your original post. You made the effort to reply. If you are going to bother writing anything at all, the least I can do is take the time to make the effort to make sure you are writing to the write place to have an impact. > It's in the spec file defined as "Name: <<the name>>" packagename-version-release.arch packagename is <<the name>> the information is there its just not the bolded part. > I see 2 identical names and descriptions just a different architecture 64bit system. They are not duplicates. How does PK know if you want the 32bit or the 64bit version of a package? > I don't have anything called: "Authorizations" in the > System->Administration menu. my mistake System->Preference->System->Authorizations > I don't want nor need that kind of power. (nice to have though) the > default policies should just be right in a released "stable" product > (fedora 10) if they aren't then it's beta/rc and doesn't belong here, I don't think your personal preference nor mine gets to define the 'right' defaults. Defaults are a matter of reasoned discussion and must balance several factors. There is an argument to be made that the one time importing of a repository key into the rpm keyring is a sensitive enough action and infrequent enough to require an administrator's authorization as a default policy. -jef -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
