On Sunday 14 December 2008 11:07:53 Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 09:47 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Christopher A. Williams wrote: > > > I'm just curious - Has anyone made any progress on figuring out why > > > VMware Server 2.0 does NOT run on F10 unless selinux is disabled? Even > > > running selinux in permissive mode causes VMware Server fits. > > > > > > This has been this way at least since VMware Server 1.x running on F8. > > > I know because I can recall having to fully disable selinux on my > > > VMware Server systems for at least that long. > > > > > > It never seems to have been fixed to this day, and that's a long time > > > for such an issue to exist. Is anyone working to resolve it? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Chris > > VMWare's SELinux problem is caused by their shady RPM's and have nothing > to do with F9/F10. > Officially, VMWare only supports RHEL 4.x and 5.x. Fedora is not > supported and their SELinux support (built into their RPMs) was designed > to support RHEL. > > In short, unless RHEL starts supporting distributions beyond EPEL and > SLES, there's nothing to be done in the Fedora side of things. > > - Gilboa I happen to have VMWare Server 1.07 running at this very moment. Is this a Ver 2 problem? -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
