Re: packagekit problem on F10

• To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: packagekit problem on F10
• From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:08:06 +0000
• In-reply-to: <1229095490.2531.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <20081210024756.GA23588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0812101656260.18406@math> <1228972548.3081.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229030633620-1645257.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229095490.2531.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 09:24 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I don't know aabout the F10 versions of thewse PakageKit rpms but as I
> keep pointing out the F9 versions cannot be installed due to missing
> dependencies. Is there any help out there for us F9 people?

I pushed an update yesterday to stable, so should be on your mirror
today.

Richard.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: packagekit problem on F10
    • From: Aaron Konstam

• References:
  • packagekit problem on F10
    • From: fred smith
  • Re: packagekit problem on F10
    • From: Blake Thornton
  • Re: packagekit problem on F10
    • From: lorenzo
  • Re: packagekit problem on F10
    • From: sandir
  • Re: packagekit problem on F10
    • From: Aaron Konstam

• Prev by Date: Re: Frirefox printing anomoly
• Next by Date: Second try: Clarification of statement about stateless sytem]
• Previous by thread: Re: packagekit problem on F10
• Next by thread: Re: packagekit problem on F10
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread