Re: infrastructure modest proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Isn't that sort of the intent of the "testing" repo?
>
> I dunno :-). Maybe we don't need another layer, maybe we just need
> the simple check for obvious dependency problems in "testing", but
> I think maybe the the associated packages might be in "testing"
> already, yet they weren't marked to go to "updates" at the same time.

Fact: the push of dbus directly to stable was a mistake.. it was not intentional

Adding yet another repository between testing and stable will not help
situations where testing was not used.  You are adding complexity
which does not solve the underlying problem.

-jef

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux