On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:07 PM, <homburg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:16:35 -0500 > Linuxguy123 <linuxguy123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I am really frustrated by some of the things that I hear >> said on this board. Specifically when someone comes on >> here and touts the "Fedora is bleeding edge software" and >> "if it isn't stable enough for you, go get another >> distribution". >> >> That is NOT the intent of Fedora. Fedora is NOT "by >> developers for developers and the hell with the end >> user". >> >> Its ultimate goal is to produce production quality user >> ready distributions. >> >> Max Spevack addressed the specific topic of goals on >> Slashdot a while ago. >> http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/17/177220 >> > > I think that Max was either a tad disingenuous or, > possibly, unaware of the economic model. Redhat spends > considerable sums on Fedora and has a fiduciary obligation > to its shareholders. There is nothing wrong with that. Not > at all. Fedora is a great "product." I accept it for what > it is. While Fedora is beholden to the hand at feeds it, Fedora's primary goal is _not_ to please RedHat. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
