Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Livna still exists and will so for the foreseeable future, as it
> contains one package (one that is used when playing DVDs) that RPM
> Fusion did not want to take.
I won't comment on that decision, but will there be a solution to the
problem that livna-release requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release? What if
someone wants only rpmfusion-free-release and livna-release? At the moment
it requires using --nodeps (and getting the nonfree one dragged in again if
it ever gets upgraded, so that's not safe) or tweaking yum.repos.d by hand.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
