Re: decrypting iptables?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:36 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Do you have any ESTABLISHED that you wouldn't ACCEPT? I just take them
> all.

Can't think of any at the moment, though there's some RELATED traffic
that I might have trepidations about.  I don't know what the rules
consider to be related, but I'd be annoyed at something like the
following (which does happen).

e.g. You browse to a website, and it connects back to you to look at
your identd service (if you have one), regardless of whether you're
logging on or browsing anonymously.

I want "related" to mean appropriately related traffic to what I'm
doing, not anything back from something that I've made some sort of
connection to.

And I can well imagine parents might relent and allow IM chat, but block
the ports used for webcams and IM file transferring.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.5-41.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux