Re: any drawbacks to 64-bit versus 32-bit install?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:31:09PM +0000, Chris Jones wrote:
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 08:31 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>
>>> Go with 64 bit.  I have gotten 3 machines with AMD64 processors and I have installed Fedora 10 Preview with 64 bit version and they are working nicely :)  It(64 bit) will make full use of the machines capabilities and if it were not for the flash player and other proprietary stuff, 64 is the way to go :)
>>
>> As pointed out in a separate thread, adobe has finally stared working on
>> and has an alpha version out of 64bit version of flash.  Check the
>> archives for the thread.  So that argument isn't relevant any longer?
>
> If flash is important to you, I think it is until is is proven to be as  
> reliable as the 32 bit version ;)

I have read that html 5 will make flash unnecessary. 

Is there any truth to that assertion?

Thanks.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux