On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 19:43 -0700, Craig White wrote: > you don't need bind to run unless you want to provide DNS services. There are advantages in doing so, but I'd learn how to do DHCP, then learn the next thing. With a local DHCP and DNS server, particular if they talk to each other, you simplify client network configuration. Your DHCP server assigns them addresses, and your DNS server reseolves all their addresses. You don't need to play with hosts files on each PC, nor any other part of their network configuration, it's all centrally managed. For anything more than a three PC LAN, it soon gets annoying if you have to keep updating all their hosts files. As Craig said, it can be simpler to use something that does that for you, such as a modem/router with its own DHCP server, there's far less things for you to have to configure. But, any of the ones that I've looked at, don't act as a local DNS server for their own DHCP records. So, you're stuck with fixing IPs in its DHCP server, then messing with hosts files on each PC. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines