* Steve <zephod@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-05 14:44]: > > ---- Deepak Bhole <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Steve <zephod@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-05 13:30]: > > > > > > ---- Deepak Bhole <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Steve <zephod@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-04 10:42]: > > > > > I'm using 2.22.2 of ephipany and my java plugin seems to have stopped working presumably as a result of a recent update (nspluginwrapper-1.1.2.2.fc9.x86_64?). > > ... > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > > > If you type in about:plugins in the address bar and hit enter, do you > > > > see Java in the list that shows up? > > > > > > No, there is no java in the list. > > > > > > > If it does not, can you paste the output of: > > > > ls -l /etc/alternatives/*javaplugin* > > > > > > $ ls -l /etc/alternatives/*javaplugin* > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 63 2008-11-03 14:55 /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 -> /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so > > > > > > Thanks for taking the time to help. > > > > > > > > > Alright, so that link looks good. We need to figure out now if that plugin > > exists, and if mozilla is expected to be seeing it. So, can you post the > > output of: > > > > ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so > > > > and: > > > > ls -l /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/*java* > > > > Deepak > > [sblackwell@asa-ws-053 ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so > ls: cannot access /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so: No such file or directory > > So that looks like a problem: > > [sblackwell@asa-ws-053 ~]$ locate gcjwebplugin.so > /usr/lib/gcj-4.3.0/libgcjwebplugin.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so > /usr/lib64/gcj-4.3.0/libgcjwebplugin.so > /usr/share/doc/libgcj-4.3.0/README.libgcjwebplugin.so > Yep, so that is definitely the problem. The alternatives seem to be messed up. Not really sure why that happened. Can you paste the output of: alternatives --display libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 ? (that will tell me if just the link is bad, or if the alternatives setup itself is broken) Deepak > Seems there is an extra jre in the path. > > [sblackwell@asa-ws-053 ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/*java* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2008-11-03 14:55 /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so -> /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 > > Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
