On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:36 -0500, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 20:03:52 +0200, > Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:05 -0400, Chris Snook wrote: > > > Joachim Backes wrote: > > ... > > > > My question: are there rules for the fedora email traffic saying: do not > > > > use signatures? > > > > > > No. Proper use of PKI (such as GPG signatures) is worth a few bytes. Anyone > > > who desperately cares about this can choose to receive mail in daily digest > > > format, which saves far more in headers than would be consumed even if everyone > > > on the list used GPG. > > > > > > -- Chris > > > > > > > ... All nice and dandy, but it would have been nice if anyone would have > > been able to give me -one- solid reason why he/she needs to sign his/her > > messages - when they are being posted in a high-volume public ML. (Geek > > factor not included) > > Non-repudiation. Yey. You managed to send a message that looks like it was sent by me. I'm shocked. ... We are talking about Fedora-users, not CVS-traffic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Gilboa -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
