Re: [OT] Flash 10 for Fedora 8 x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I just upgraded without issue on a x86_64 F8 system. I installed the i386
>version as I did not see a native 64bit version available using "yum list
>'*flash*'". It seems to be much more CPU efficient. I haven't done any real
>benchmarking but almost anything maxed my system out before (especially really
>flash heavy sites like www.starcraft2.com) but now it works almost
>flawlessly.Richard

 I use the yum repo for Adobe and did 
yum update flash-plugin 
on a machine running f8 i386
which seemed to work OK - but I tried the site you quoted and it failed to work.

When I looked at about:plugins I found there were two versions of shockwave flash
listed - which puzzled me. So I did
yum remove flash-plugin
followed by 
yum install flash-plugin

the site above then worked.... 

so I checked another machine running f8 i386 and also found two versions of 
"shockwave flash" listed in about:plugins

Odd!





-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux