Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 <at> gmail.com> writes: > I just upgraded without issue on a x86_64 F8 system. I installed the i386 >version as I did not see a native 64bit version available using "yum list >'*flash*'". It seems to be much more CPU efficient. I haven't done any real >benchmarking but almost anything maxed my system out before (especially really >flash heavy sites like www.starcraft2.com) but now it works almost >flawlessly.Richard I use the yum repo for Adobe and did yum update flash-plugin on a machine running f8 i386 which seemed to work OK - but I tried the site you quoted and it failed to work. When I looked at about:plugins I found there were two versions of shockwave flash listed - which puzzled me. So I did yum remove flash-plugin followed by yum install flash-plugin the site above then worked.... so I checked another machine running f8 i386 and also found two versions of "shockwave flash" listed in about:plugins Odd! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
