Yes, as a matter of fact I was. But that introduces a new wrinkle. For some reason, the interface would keep coming up disabled using the regular network config. So, when I tried the new-fangled NetworkManager it would come up active. (And yes, I had it set to activate on boot, so that wasn't the problem.) So, any ideas on why the interface would come up inactive? -Greg >> FC9 with latest updates >> >> I've configured bind with all the defaults and modified bind.conf to >> answer questions on all interfaces to all clients. >> >> But weird stuff is happening. >> >> bind/named starts properly on boot. >> But it refuses to resolve for any hosts other than localhost. > Just a guess? Are you useing the default NetworkManager daemon rathrer > than the traditional network one? > NetworkManager doesn't start the network immediately, and I wonder if on > boot-up the network connectivity isn't in place when bind starts. > If you are not using wireless, try stopping NetworkManager and starting > network as the default daemons. > Steve -- Best regards, listserv mailto:listserv.traffic@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines