Re: 32bit vs 64bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Henning Larsen wrote:

| On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
|
|> Now, when it comes to non-free binary blob device drivers, the
availability
|> of non-free binary blobs is somewhat better for 32 bit than for 64
bit. To
|> my knowledge, there is no 64 bit version of a browser Flash plugin.
|>
|> If you do not need Flash, and you do not use non-free binary blob device
|> drivers, 64 bit will work just as well as 32 bit.

| Ok that's the problem, I want flash, I wait and see if someone fix that.
| ?????

The 32-bit flash plugin works fine for me on 64-bit Fedora8, using the
nspluginwrapper package.

- --

- -John (john@xxxxxxxxxxx)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI0ReUjXa7jixmuZsRApufAJ9vou53YlDJtQtiy7J7nDNHQ87GYACbBIwj
zdIi97iCK0XrvYRO2JW1o5U=
=UZpK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux