On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 15:32 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > No in evolution the terminology is different. I personally have not > use for threads which contain mail with different subject lines. But > to each his own. > > Actually now that I think about it, I am not sure that evolution > supports threads of the type Tim describes. It most certainly does, and so do a lot of other decent clients. But it doesn't really matter if a person doesn't want to see threaded messages in their own client, so long as they don't send messages in a way that breaks threading for other people. Such as replying to someone's message instead of starting a *new* thread for a "new" message (thread hijacking). Or, not doing a proper reply when you reply to someone's message, like replying to someone else's message and responding to a prior quote, or starting a new message and cutting and pasting between them, or using a client that destroys the in-reply-to and references headers (breaking a thread). -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines