On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I take it that this is a different thing, again, than what we saw when > we first run Firefox 3 on Fedora 9? (About how the anti-scamming > feature that Firefox used will chat with a third party about the site > you're visiting to check it, and that you had the choice of potentially > losing some privacy by using the feature, or turning off the feature.) Here's the problem... Steve hasn't actually seen how the EULA situation for FF3 is handled in Fedora 9. And apparently neither has Shuttleworth if I'm reading the ubuntu ticket correctly. I would encourage Steve to take a step back.. actually experience the the Fedora 9 arrangement for FF3 and then start a new thread in context of the problems of what we are actually doing, and not try to base a discussion on what Ubuntu is or is not doing. Once Steve sees how Fedora 9 handles the Firefox situation, he can then compare and constrast with how Ubuntu it handling it. And then if he still feels odd about how we are actually handling it.. start a new thread...specifically about the problems associated with the text we are showing. It's absolutely pointless to have a discussion about EULA text we are not showing. jef"Is pretty sure that Ubuntu isn't showing this: http://fedoraproject.org/static/firefox/ "spaleta -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
