Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:28:36 +0900
Joel Rees <joel.rees@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because I never thought the list was informative.
This is a perception that needs correcting.
Actually, when this all started, I took a look at the
announce list archives, and came to the definitive conclusion
that in fact, it really isn't an informative list.
I mean, even the announcement that started this whole
mess can't be called informative :-).
What we really need is the fedora-disaster list that
comes with a guarantee that no message not related to imminent
peril to all fedora users is ever posted to the list.
I might consider subscribing to that, but really I still
think messages of that nature should be cross posted
to all fedora mailing lists.
I like that name. We may even get cross-platform subscribers.
Jim
--
Yes, many primitive people still believe this myth...But in today's
technical
vastness of the future, we can guess that surely things were much different.
- The Firesign Theater
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
