Gene Heskett wrote: > With all due respect for Paul, an announcement like this truly belongs on > the mail list, not on some list only 2% are subbed to. I'm not going to make up bogus percentages but I'm sure there are many Fedora users who don't read fedora-list. I've been participating on this list for a few months now, and I've been here a few times before. I think I may soon have to leave this list again as other things will take up my time, but I'll remain subscribed to fedora-announce-list. Even now I skip large parts of fedora-list, following only some threads, so I could easily miss an announcement made on this list. I used to have all the Fedora lists mixed in the same mail folder, but now I have separate sub-folders for fedora-list, fedora-announce-list and fedora-package-announce. That way important announcements don't drown in the noise on the other lists, and I can more easily delete old package announcements while keeping archives of the other lists longer. One can expect people to subscribe to either fedora-list or fedora-announce-list but not both, and send all announcements to both lists, or else one can expect people who want to receive announcements to subscribe to fedora-announce-list, and send the announcements to that list. I vote for the latter. Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list