On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:56 +0000, g wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Phil Meyer wrote: > > asterik@home was all the rage a couple years ago. Probably still the > > best, although renamed to trixbox. > > thanks for reply. > > trixbox looks like a great system as it derives from asterisk@home. > > pbx style system is way too much over kill for what i would like to use > for a home system with just 2 phones. > > may be wanting 'voice mail' is going too far, and cutting back to just > answering and recording when i need it. > > i have an auto answering system with 2 wireless sets. problem is that > playback at base unit has died, but i can still playback from wireless > sets. > > any other suggestions with less features of trixbox??? ---- I think if you google around, you will find a lot of PO'd people at trixbox because of back doors they put in the software. Also, I was under the impression that you wanted to use POTS stuff and trixbox, asterisk, etc. is all VOIP which requires a whole new investment in hardware. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list