On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:11:42AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > p.s. refresh my memory, axel, if you would -- are your AT packages > compatible with livna packages? It often depends on the livna packager. Suffice it to say that I've been a mirror for livna for several years now, so actually my intentions were to be compatible. But there are many cases were this didn't happen. > would there be any difference in which qemu packages i used that > aren't available in the stock fedora repo? The packages at ATrpms are not conflicting with the stock repo or replacing anything. They are "just" accelerating qemu. E.g. you will need the Fedora stock qemu to get started anyway, and you can (optionally) add kqemu kmdls to speed it up. http://bellard.org/qemu/kqemu-tech.html -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpNXW6Yb61dF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
