Gordon Messmer wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
One person should not have to bear the development cost of something
that could be widely used. But there is no fair mechanism to share it
with GPL-covered code.
So, you're arguing that it's not fair that you should have to write your
own code when GPLed software is available, and it's also not fair that
you have to use a compatible license in order to use GPLed work?
More specifically, it is not desirable that people are compelled to
obtain their software from a monopolistic company because restrictions
on otherwise almost-usable free code keep it from being competitive.
It is also not desirable that people are deprived from being able to
share all the potentially useful combinations of GPL-encumbered code
with code that is actually free. While technically every user could
obtain his own copy of each and do the necessary work or hire someone to
to combine them, the GPL will prevent sharing it in the improved form.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
