On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:37:51PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Someone came out against them, just search Distrowatch. That they > did not fully comply with the GPL? (...) > Someone did/or other opposing distros that did not want those distros > to get the attention that they were getting. The code is available for > free from some places, is that a sufficient condition? Why do people > have to tarnish products when they are doing good and those that are > not accuse them of violating the GPL? You seem to advocate a weird notion of rewarding copyright infringement. > The people should decide in the end what they want to call it, is that fair? Well, you can call "ant" to elephants, but they won't stop being elephants just because you're really loud and insistent about it. Linux's latest release can be obtained in its full and pure glory right here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.26.tar.bz2 [47 MB] Now if you want to insist on calling other things "Linux", go ahead and do it. It's your prerogative to make that mistake. Rui -- Pzat! Today is Pungenday, the 57th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3174 + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
